![]() |
| |||||||
More News
For Immediate Release:
2004-02-17
Contact:
A News Release Computer Recycling Bill Moves Forward
Olympia,
Wash.—Legislation to address the increasing problem of electronic waste
passed the House of Representatives 94-0 yesterday. Sponsored by Rep. Mike
Cooper (D-Edmonds), SHB 2488 would require the Department of Ecology to work
with electronics manufacturers and retailers, local governments, environmental
groups, and others to develop recommendations for financing and implementing
a statewide solution for collecting, recycling, and reusing obsolete computers
and TVs. Electronic
equipment contains lead, mercury and other hazardous substances that pose
a threat to human health and the environment when improperly disposed. In
2002, an estimated 1.7 million monitors, computers and TVs from residents
and small businesses became obsolete in Washington State. Responsibly recycling
this equipment would cost an estimated $25 million. "We
need to find a solution quickly so that taxpayers and local governments aren’t
stuck with the bill," said Ivy Sager-Rosenthal of the Washington Public
Interest Research Group (WashPIRG). "Recycling electronic products not
only benefits the environment and public health, but with the increased need
for collection and recycling infrastructure, it also creates jobs." SHB 2488
would require Ecology, business, local governments, environmental organizations,
and others to examine current electronic product recycling programs in the
state, encourage pilot programs as needed, and research different approaches
for financing a collection and recycling system. Ecology must submit its recommendations
by December 2004. Environmental
groups and other proponents of SHB 2488 want computer and TV manufacturers
to finance the collection and recycling programs for the products they sell.
Called "extended producer responsibility," this approach is being
implemented in Japan, Europe, Taiwan and elsewhere. "Requiring
manufacturers to pay to recycle the products they sell creates a financial
incentive for them to design products that are less toxic, more upgradeable,
and easier to recycle," said Suellen Mele of Washington Citizens for
Resource Conservation. "This should be one of the main goals of any recycling
program." Meanwhile,
at the national level, three years of negotiations among electronics manufacturers,
governments and environmental stakeholders ended without reaching a final
agreement to solve the e-waste problem. It’s now up to the industry representatives
to develop a comprehensive front-end financing model that is supported by
a significant portion of the market share of both the computer and television
sectors. If manufacturers come to an agreement on the financing system, a
decision will be made whether to reconvene the entire national stakeholder
group. Industry’s
ability to resolve the differences among their own ranks is uncertain. It’s
also unknown whether or when national legislation needed to implement such
a system could be passed. "With
so little assurance of a national solution, Washington State needs to move
forward to solve its own e-waste problems and provide citizens with convenient,
no-cost recycling options," said Suellen Mele. "SHB 2488 would be
a step in that direction." Information
on national efforts to develop a nationwide collection, recycling, and reuse
program can be found at www.NEPSI.org. |
SEARCH THIS SITE |