logo
Standing Up To Powerful Interests

Seattle Green Bag Campaign

 

What's New

Recently, we discovered that Exxon-Mobil, Dow Chemical, and their friends at the American Plastics Council plan to spend $500,000 in new, out of state campaign funds to defeat Seattle's Referendum 1. Referendum 1 would reduce paper and plastic bag waste, curb pollution, and reduce city spending by encouraging the use of reusable bags.

How You Can Help

Unfortunately, out of state specials interests are spending huge sums of money to defeat this common sense measure. Please sign our petition to the American Plastics Council demanding that they keep their hands off of Seattle's laws. Then, forward our fact sheet to your friends or post it prominently at work or in your community.

 



Overview

It’s estimated that Seattle shoppers use 360 million disposable shopping bags, paper and plastic, each year. Last year, after large voter outcry against this waste, Seattle passed an ordinance establishing a 20 cent fee on disposable shopping bags. The measure provides a market-based incentive for smart shopping, and generates revenues to promote recycling and waste reduction and to supply reusable shopping bags to low-income consumers.

These bags litter our streets, clog our waterways, pollute our oceans, jam our recycling equipment, and cost the city in cleanup costs.

Defeating the Green Fee in Seattle is critical in the American Chemistry Council’s national effort to defeat similar efforts across the country. They did it in California (Los Angeles and San Francisco), they’re doing it here, and they’re gearing up to do it in other cities considering similar legislation (like Portland, ME). By their calculations – if they can beat it in Seattle, they can beat it anywhere.



Quick Facts

• Plastic and paper bags aren’t free. Plastic bags cost grocery stores 3-5 cents each. Paper bags cost up to three times that much. More importantly, disposable bags cost our cities up to an estimated 17 cents per bag for disposal and cleanup, which really means it costs you the tax payer that amount.

• The production of plastic bags requires petroleum and often natural gas, both non-renewable resources that increase our dependency on foreign suppliers.

Recycling these bags simply doesn’t cut it. From the process of sorting, to the contamination of inks and the overall low quality of the plastic used in plastics bags, recyclers would much rather focus on recycling the vast quantities of more viable materials such as soda and milk bottles that can be recycled far more efficiently. If the economics don't work, recycling efforts don't work.

• Many bags collected for recycling never get recycled
. A growing trend is to ship them to Third world countries like India and China which are rapidly becoming the dumping grounds for the Western world's glut of recyclables. Rather than being recycled they are cheaply incinerated under more lax environmental laws

• As proposed, the Seattle Green Bag fee would reduce the use of paper and plastic bags by around 70%.

• Shortly after the signing of the ordinance, the American Chemistry Council quickly spent almost $250,000 bringing in paid signature gatherers from California to put a measure on the 2009 ballot on whether Seattle should keep its latest environmental law. After succeeding in buying their way out of this for another year (and stopping the public education work that was about to start), their crew moved on to Nevada.

Campaign Resource

Disposable Bags Are A Waste (.pdf flyer)



 

SEARCH THIS SITE